In most of the cases, the latency problems are from the backend to our customers. They want to be able to access our data as fast as possible. Sometimes things are different, and the real challenge is to find ways how you can provide a reliable and fast way for customers to upload their content to the backend system.
Imagine that you have a system where agents around the world upload insurance policies every few minutes. The system is hosted in only one Azure Region – UK West. From the quality attributes of the system, there is no need to deploy the solution in multiple locations and building a native application or plugin for this purpose it is not acceptable (there is no business justification). Even so, agents are all around the world and the latency and internet speed, it’s a fact that needs to be handled.
At a high level, the system uses Azure Storage and Azure CosmosDB to store information that it is uploaded by agents. Agents are using a web portal and some REST API that runs inside Azure Web Apps. A horde of Azure Functions is crunking the uploaded content and push the content over Azure Service Bus to other backend systems that are out of our scope. Every day more than 5000 agents are online and on average, there are 500000 files uploaded every day.
Client requirement is simple:
Reduce as much as possible the latency and improve the upload experience of the agents. They complain that uploaded speed and application reliability is a big concern.
Let’s keep things as simple as possible and accept that deploying the solution in multiple locations it is not acceptable. Azure CDN can be used to cache content when you want to be closer to the customers, but we need the opposite thing.
The set of actions that we can take are:
(1) Improve the reliability of the system that handles the upload
(2) Improve the client experience on the web application
(3) Identify how you can bring the land zone closer to the agents
The system already uses HTTPS protocol that offers pause and resume of an upload. To improve the performance and reduce the stress on the web application, we could rely on Azure Blob Storage. The agents could upload content directly to an Azure Storage – an upload link together with a SAS could be generated automatically.
From my experience, I notified that the scalability and reliability of uploading content directly to Azure Blob Storage is much higher vs implementing your own API.
The reliability of the connectivity is one of the biggest concerns, especially for agents that are using the system while they commute (e.g. unreliable connectivity when a train is inside a tunnel). In these situations, the client web application shall use the local storage to cache content and persist user information until the connectivity is restored. Combined with a Filepond, the client experience should be the same even if they lose connectivity for a few seconds or minutes.
Bringing file land zone closer to agents
There are multiple approaches to this problem. From the start, Azure CDN is not a viable solution; it is used to bring static content closer to customers and not the other way around. At this moment in time, there are 58 different Azure Regions around the globe. A simple solution would be to create multiple landing zones in different Azure Regions by measuring the latency between agents and the UK region.
After analyzing the latency and the agents' distribution, the decision was the following: Create Azure Blob Storages that are used as landing zones in the following Azure Regions:
- UAE Central
- Japan West
- East Asia
- North Central US
- South Africa West
The backend system identifies the user location automatically and allocates the closest landing zone, that it is used by the client web application to upload the content. The agent is not aware related to the location where content is uploaded. Besides this solution, there are also other commercial solutions on the market, based on the same principle.
After doing a PoC we identify that the upload experience is not improved drastically by the solution. Why? Because the real issues were not from the latency as the client expected. It is from the way how the client web application is implemented.
After analyzing the above options, measuring the impact and the outcome, the results were the following.
- By having multiple landing zones in different geographical locations, there is no real improvement to upload experience. The complexity of the system increases drastically without a real benefit.