Skip to main content

Lift and Shift - cloud migration strategy

By
During discussion on different cloud projects I observed that people are using “Lift and Shift” terminology with multiple meanings. This can create confusion between different parties, especially when technical team from each team understand a different thing.

What is Lift and Shift?
Lift and Shift is a migration strategy that is based on the concept of replication 1 to 1 of the environment that exist on-premises inside cloud (Microsoft Azure). This involves the migration of all computation, storage and other services without replacing them with specific Azure services.

What is not Lift and Shift?
When you have a File Server system on the current infrastructure. Lift and Shift in this case shall not include replacing it with Azure Files. Involves just taking the File Servers instances from on-premises and putting them inside Azure VMs.

Another good example is when you migrate a web farm. If you decide to do just a Lift and Shift, than you should just spin Azure VMs where you would use Apache or IIS to host your web endpoints. In this case migrating to App Services and Web Apps is not anymore Lift and Shift.

I’m doing something wrong if I migrate to specific Azure Services?
No, there is nothing wrong in it. Migrating to App Services for example when you host a web site might be a good choice but this such a migration is not a Lift and Shift migration anymore. Just be careful how you define the migration and how you call it.

Why Lift and Shift is important?
In comparison with other migration strategy, Lift and Shift doesn’t replace current services with new ones. This means that in most of the cases the migration will be fast and the level of success confident it is high.
In general, when you use Lift and Shift, the current application SLAs are not affected.

What I don’t get?
From running cost perspective, doing just a Lift and Shift will not reduce costs or optimize consumption. The same thing is from NFRs and SLAs.

Think about Lift and Shift just the 1st step of a migration plan. Once you have your system running inside Azure, you can start identify components and layers of the system that can be replaced by native Azure Services like Azure Files, App Services, Azure SQL.
I call this kind of migration – baby steps. In this way, you can control the risks and reduce the impact to your system. The risk of a fail is reduce drastically.


Conclusion
Don’t forget about terminology. All parties in a discussion shall understand the same thing when you say “Lift and Shift” – one to one migration. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

By
In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

By
In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...
Post a Comment
Read more

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

By
Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...
8 comments
Read more