Skip to main content

Just deleted an Azure SQL Database by mistake! What's next?

There are times when you make mistakes, big mistakes like…
…deleting an Azure SQL Database…
In this post, we will take a look on what are the steps that needs to be done to recover and restore a deleted database. We are in the context where you have a Standard database, without any special features related to backups.

Trigger
I just realized that I deleted the wrong database and I do not have any custom backups mechanism configured. What should I do?

Time is crucial 
Time is one of the most important factors. The backups of deleted databases is stored for a limited time. The time window depends based on the instance type. In this time window, you can restore a deleted database without any kind of problems. The retention policies for backups is 7 days for Basic and 35 days for Standard and Premium.
Azure SQL Server created automatically backups to your databases. These backups are used to restore a deleted database. Don’t forget that as for on-premises backups, things can go wrong during the restoration procedures.

Steps to restore the deleted Azure SQL Database
Step 1: Go to your Azure SQL Server instance
Step 2: Navigate to Deleted Databases
Step 3: Select the Azure SQL database that you want to restore and trigger the restoration procedure


Tips 

  • Don’t forget to rename your database with the previous name. 
  • If the database is to recent, than you might not have a backup to restore (first 30 minutes).
  • User access is persisted and restored.
  • Backups are created automatically.
  • Backups are created on RA-GRS storages (geo-redundancy).
  • The backups system is based a SQL database backup combined with transaction logs.
  • You can reconfigure retention policy up to 10 years (you will need in this case to pay for storage).
  • Transparent data encryption is used for all backups (backups are encrypted), when TDE is active at database level.


Conclusion
Don’t panic if you delete a database. Depending on your database size, you can fully restore it in a few minutes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...