Skip to main content

Why back-off mechanism are critical in cloud solutions

What is a back-off mechanism?
It's one of the most basic mechanism used for communication between two systems. The core idea of this mechanism is to decrease the frequency of requests send from system A to system B if there are no data or communication issues are detected.
There are multiple implementation of this system, but I'm 100% sure that you use it directly of indirectly. A retry mechanism that increase the time period is a back-off mechanism.

Why it is important in cloud solutions?
In contrast with a classical system, a cloud subscription will come at the end of the month with a bill details that will contain all the costs.
People discover often too late that there are many services where you pay also for each request (transaction) that you do on that service. For example, each request that is done to Azure Storage or to Azure Service Bus is billable. Of course the price is extremely low - Azure Service Bus costs is around 4 cents for 1.000.000 requests, but when you have a system that is not written in the right way, you'll end up adding additional costs.
I remember a few years ago, we didn't had a back-off mechanism for Azure Service Bus Queue, end even if we didn't had data we checked every 10ms. Guess what happen? At the end of the month we had around 30% of costs only from this kind of requests. Once we implemented the right back-off mechanism we reduce the cost of transaction to under 0.50$.

Where is applicable?
Don't forget that this topic is applicable not only when a cloud services is not reachable, but also for cases when you don't have data, but you make requests to often.

How we should implement it?
If you are a developer you might jump directly to whiteboard and start designing an algorithm that increase the time interval with a specific rate if there is no data or there are connection problems.
Before doing something likes this check what kind of protocol you are using and what libraries you are using.
Solved by Protocol
Nowadays, there are many communication protocols that keep an open connection between the two parties. It means that you will never specify a time interval and in the moment when there are data on the other end, your system is notified.
Solved by client libraries
All client libraries offered by Microsoft for Azure contains a retry policy mechanism, that can be used and extended with success. I seen people that were using back-off mechanism without knowing it - the client library was already using it with default values (smile).
I think that in most of the cases, the existing mechanism are enough to solve our core problems.

As we can see in the above example, even if we are increasing the time, there is a maximum threshold, that we can set based on our business needs (NFRs).

Should I ignore it?
No, you should never ignore it. But don't add extra complexity if you don't need it. Start and try a simple mechanism and based on your needs develop a more complex one.
If you need a custom back-off mechanism ask yourself why you are different from the rest of the consumers. You don't want to invest in something that you will not need or use at full capacity. It is just extra effort.

References
An extremlty useful resource for Azure clients is "Retry service specific guidance" -  https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/best-practices-retry-service-specific

 

Comments

  1. Indeed, reducing costs might be an advantage, however the backoff alghoritms are usually used to avoid congestion and contention in a system. Indeed, most of us are using it without knowing, since most of our servers are using the Ethernet protocol :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...