Skip to main content

Ordering logs with different timestamp

Time is relative? Yes, it is. When you need to write Audit Data and Logs, you don’t want to have a relative time on different systems.
There are different protocalls for time synchronization like NTP that can help us to synchronize the time on machines. Unfortunately, based on firewall configuration or the type of access we have on that machines we might not be able to use NTP protocol.
Even if we are using NTP, depending on server configuration we can have a deviation of 1-2s between machines. A deviation of a few seconds might not be too much until you write logs and you try them to order them based on time. In this situation, reading the logs is not so simple – the logs order will not match with the execution order of the actions that were logged. Trying to understand what happen inside the system wil be hard.

If this is not enough, we might have cases when our application is running in different environments that are using different time servers. For example, we can have a group of systems that are running on Azure machines, another group of systems that are running on-premises and another set of machines from AWS. The time will not match perfectly. Each server  will have a small time difference.

Usualy all NTP servers are sync between each others, but still, there can be a small time difference. The biggest problem is with on-premises systems, where the deviation can be 1s or more.
What we could do in this situation? Our mission is to be able to order logs from a timeline perspective, in the correct order.
From the time perspective, logs that were generated by the same system can be ordered correctly using the time information.
Another important information that we have is that we know the flow of data and logic inside the system. This means that we know that a request is first processed by system A, after it will be processed by system B and so on.
Even if we have cycles in the flow between different system, we can consider that when the current requests arrives in a system where it was already, we can view it as a new system.
Using this approach, we define ‘gates’ inside our system that can be tracked and numbered. If each gate has a different number or id, we are able to order them based on this information. In this way we can put all our logs in only one repository, order them based on the system (gate) number and each group of logs can be ordered based on the time.
Different tracking ID of the request will help us to identify from the logs repository the request that we want to analyze.
In the end we will have the right order of our logs and we’ll be able to read them like a story. For complex scenarios, we might need to work a little more, but the main idea will remain the same.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to check in AngularJS if a service was register or not

There are cases when you need to check in a service or a controller was register in AngularJS.
For example a valid use case is when you have the same implementation running on multiple application. In this case, you may want to intercept the HTTP provider and add a custom step there. This step don’t needs to run on all the application, only in the one where the service exist and register.
A solution for this case would be to have a flag in the configuration that specify this. In the core you would have an IF that would check the value of this flag.
Another solution is to check if a specific service was register in AngularJS or not. If the service was register that you would execute your own logic.
To check if a service was register or not in AngularJS container you need to call the ‘has’ method of ‘inhector’. It will return TRUE if the service was register.
if ($injector.has('httpInterceptorService')) { $httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpInterceptorService&#…

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

Run native .NET application in Docker (.NET Framework 4.6.2)

Scope
The main scope of this post is to see how we can run a legacy application written in .NET Framework in Docker.

Context
First of all, let’s define what is a legacy application in our context. By a legacy application we understand an application that runs .NET Framework 3.5 or higher in a production environment where we don’t have any more the people or documentation that would help us to understand what is happening behind the scene.
In this scenarios, you might want to migrate the current solution from a standard environment to Docker. There are many advantages for such a migration, like:

Continuous DeploymentTestingIsolationSecurity at container levelVersioning ControlEnvironment Standardization
Until now, we didn’t had the possibility to run a .NET application in Docker. With .NET Core, there was support for .NET Core in Docker, but migration from a full .NET framework to .NET Core can be costly and even impossible. Not only because of lack of features, but also because once you…