Skip to main content

Ordering logs with different timestamp

Time is relative? Yes, it is. When you need to write Audit Data and Logs, you don’t want to have a relative time on different systems.
There are different protocalls for time synchronization like NTP that can help us to synchronize the time on machines. Unfortunately, based on firewall configuration or the type of access we have on that machines we might not be able to use NTP protocol.
Even if we are using NTP, depending on server configuration we can have a deviation of 1-2s between machines. A deviation of a few seconds might not be too much until you write logs and you try them to order them based on time. In this situation, reading the logs is not so simple – the logs order will not match with the execution order of the actions that were logged. Trying to understand what happen inside the system wil be hard.

If this is not enough, we might have cases when our application is running in different environments that are using different time servers. For example, we can have a group of systems that are running on Azure machines, another group of systems that are running on-premises and another set of machines from AWS. The time will not match perfectly. Each server  will have a small time difference.

Usualy all NTP servers are sync between each others, but still, there can be a small time difference. The biggest problem is with on-premises systems, where the deviation can be 1s or more.
What we could do in this situation? Our mission is to be able to order logs from a timeline perspective, in the correct order.
From the time perspective, logs that were generated by the same system can be ordered correctly using the time information.
Another important information that we have is that we know the flow of data and logic inside the system. This means that we know that a request is first processed by system A, after it will be processed by system B and so on.
Even if we have cycles in the flow between different system, we can consider that when the current requests arrives in a system where it was already, we can view it as a new system.
Using this approach, we define ‘gates’ inside our system that can be tracked and numbered. If each gate has a different number or id, we are able to order them based on this information. In this way we can put all our logs in only one repository, order them based on the system (gate) number and each group of logs can be ordered based on the time.
Different tracking ID of the request will help us to identify from the logs repository the request that we want to analyze.
In the end we will have the right order of our logs and we’ll be able to read them like a story. For complex scenarios, we might need to work a little more, but the main idea will remain the same.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

What to do when you hit the throughput limits of Azure Storage (Blobs)

In this post we will talk about how we can detect when we hit a throughput limit of Azure Storage and what we can do in that moment. Context If we take a look on Scalability Targets of Azure Storage ( https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/storage-scalability-targets/ ) we will observe that the limits are prety high. But, based on our business logic we can end up at this limits. If you create a system that is hitted by a high number of device, you can hit easily the total number of requests rate that can be done on a Storage Account. This limits on Azure is 20.000 IOPS (entities or messages per second) where (and this is very important) the size of the request is 1KB. Normally, if you make a load tests where 20.000 clients will hit different blobs storages from the same Azure Storage Account, this limits can be reached. How we can detect this problem? From client, we can detect that this limits was reached based on the HTTP error code that is returned by HTTP