Skip to main content

Payload Replication - Temporary and Master of data

There are moments in time when you focus on small things and you might miss bigger and more important things.

Working on a solution that is distributed in multiple Azure Regions across the world we had to replicated binary content (files) in all data centers where our solution runs.
The system that push this content is an on-premises system. In this context we decided to use a temporary location where the content is copied first and from where we replicate the content in other regions.

As we can see, the Temp location is used to replicate the content all around the glob. The system is smart enough to balance the load and if multiple replicas are needed in the same Azure Regions, only one copy will be done from the Temp location.
Once the replication is done, the binary content from the Temp location is removed automatically.

Nothing special until this, until in the moment when you ask yourself what is happening if one of the Replicas is corrupted or something happens and you lose data (partially or totally).
In such a case, of course you can go to the master - on-premises system. But when you work with hundreds of terabits, the check and the recovery of the lost  replica will take a while.
There is no way for our replicas to fetch the data from an Azure location, even if there was a time when we had this content (in the moment when we copied in the Temp folder).

There is a clear mistake on this flow. We don't have a location that can play the role of the master (internally in our system). The on-premises system is an external system that push data. We should still have in our own system a master for this data.

A solution that is complex and requires costs at the development and maintenance is to track all the replicas and when there is a fail, to be able to provide a source from another replica. In this way, we don't need the extra space for storage. On the other hand the solution is complex and might be more buggy.
In the same time, if we take into consideration that from this replicas, there will be a lot of download activity, the real cost is not from storage, it will be from download.

The most simple solution is to have in the same location as the Temp location a 'Master' for our payloads. This master can be used situations when one of our replica is our of sync. The Master can be secured easily for unexpected situations if we activate geo-replication

As we can see, in this moment we have a Master for our content that can be used in the case of a out of sync situation with one of our replicas.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to check in AngularJS if a service was register or not

There are cases when you need to check in a service or a controller was register in AngularJS.
For example a valid use case is when you have the same implementation running on multiple application. In this case, you may want to intercept the HTTP provider and add a custom step there. This step don’t needs to run on all the application, only in the one where the service exist and register.
A solution for this case would be to have a flag in the configuration that specify this. In the core you would have an IF that would check the value of this flag.
Another solution is to check if a specific service was register in AngularJS or not. If the service was register that you would execute your own logic.
To check if a service was register or not in AngularJS container you need to call the ‘has’ method of ‘inhector’. It will return TRUE if the service was register.
if ($injector.has('httpInterceptorService')) { $httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpInterceptorService&#…

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

Run native .NET application in Docker (.NET Framework 4.6.2)

Scope
The main scope of this post is to see how we can run a legacy application written in .NET Framework in Docker.

Context
First of all, let’s define what is a legacy application in our context. By a legacy application we understand an application that runs .NET Framework 3.5 or higher in a production environment where we don’t have any more the people or documentation that would help us to understand what is happening behind the scene.
In this scenarios, you might want to migrate the current solution from a standard environment to Docker. There are many advantages for such a migration, like:

Continuous DeploymentTestingIsolationSecurity at container levelVersioning ControlEnvironment Standardization
Until now, we didn’t had the possibility to run a .NET application in Docker. With .NET Core, there was support for .NET Core in Docker, but migration from a full .NET framework to .NET Core can be costly and even impossible. Not only because of lack of features, but also because once you…