Skip to main content

Deep dive in Append Blob - A new type of Azure Storage Blob

In this post we will take a look about a new type of blob - Append Blob
Until now, we had two types of blobs in Azure Storage:
  • Page Blob
  • Block Blob

Block Blob is useful when we needs to work with large files. Each block can have different sized (max 4 MB) and we can work with each block independently. Features similar with transactions are supported on blocks. The maximum size of a block blob is 195 GB.
Page Blob are optimized for random access. A Page Blob is a collection of pages of 512 bytes and are useful when we need to support random access to the content (read and write). We can refer to a specific location of a Page Blob very similar with a cursor. The maximum size of a Page Blob is 1 TB. When you create a Page Blob you need to specify the maximum size of the Page Blob (and you will pay for it from the beginning, even if you don't use all the space.

Append Blob

Concept
This new type of blob is formed by multiple blocks. Each time when you create a block, it will be added to the end of the blob. There is no support to modify or delete an existing block. Once a block was added to the end of the Append Blob it will be automatically available for read operations.
The size of each block is not fixed, the maximum size is 4 MB. The maximum size of an Append Blob is the same as for Block Blob - 195 GB. We can even say that an Append Blob is like a Block Blob, but optimized for appending block at the end of the blob.



Sample Code
The default Nuget library allow us to work with Append Blob in a very similar way how we work with Append Blob. The library allows us to append a stream, an array of bytes, text of even the content of a specific file.
The below sample, presents how we can append a text to our blob.
CloudStorageAccount cloudStorageAccount = CloudStorageAccount
  .Parse(CloudConfigurationManager.GetSetting("FooStorageConnectionString"));
CloudBlobClient cloudBlobClient = cloudStorageAccount.CreateCloudBlobClient();
CloudBlobContainer cloudBlobContainer = cloudBlobClient.GetContainerReference("fooContainer");
cloudBlobContainer.CreateIfNotExists();

CloudAppendBlob cloudAppendBlob = cloudBlobContainer.GetAppendBlobReference("fooBlob.txt");
cloudAppendBlob.CreateOrReplace();
cloudAppendBlob.AppendText("Content added");
cloudAppendBlob.AppendText("More content added");
cloudAppendBlob.AppendText("Even more content added");

string appendBlobContent = cloudAppendBlob.DownloadText();

When to use Append Blob?
Append blob should be used when we need to append content to a blob and we don't care about the order. It is very useful in use cases like logging. For logging we can have multiple threads and processed that needs to write content on the same blob. For a case like this, Append Blob is the perfect solution, allowing us to dump the logs in a fast and safe way.

Conclusion
In conclusion we can say that Append Blob is a type of blob that allow us:

  • To append content at the end of the blob
  • Maximum size is 195 GB
  • Allows us to have multiple writers on different blocks
  • Perfect for logging situations
  • Doesn't allow us to modify or delete a block
  • A block is available for read in the moment when was written

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...