Skip to main content

Entity Framework (EF) TransactionScope vs Database.BeginTransaction

In today blog post we will talk a little about a new feature that is available on EF6+ related to Transactions.
Until now, when we had to use transaction we used ‘TransactionScope’. It works great and I would say that is something that is now in our blood.
using (var scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required)) 
            { 
                using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("...")) 
                { 
                    conn.Open(); 
                    SqlCommand sqlCommand = new SqlCommand(); 
                    sqlCommand.Connection = conn; 
                    sqlCommand.CommandText = ...
                    sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); 
 
                    ...
                }  
                scope.Complete(); 
            }
Starting with EF6.0 we have a new way to work with transactions. The new approach is based on Database.BeginTransaction(), Database.Rollback(), Database.Commit(). Yes, no more TransactionScope.
In the following example we create a new transaction and use it to commit our changes.
using (var dbContextTransaction = context.Database.BeginTransaction()) 
                { 
                    try 
                    { 
                        context.Foo.Add(foo);
                        context.Foo.Add(foo);
                        context.SaveChanges();
                        dbContextTransaction.Commit(); 
                    } 
                    catch (Exception) 
                    { 
                        dbContextTransaction.Rollback(); 
                    } 
                } 
The new feature allow us to pass an existing transaction between different context and even reuse an existing transaction using Database.UseTransaction().
using (var context = new FooContext(conn, contextOwnsConnection: false)) 
                        { 
                           context.Database.UseTransaction(myTransaction); 
         context.Foo.Add(foo);
                           context.SaveChanges(); 
                        } 
 
                        myTransaction.Commit(); 
The next tables shows what are the features supported by the new way to execute transaction in comparison with the old one.
Property
Database.BeginTransaction
(new feature)
TransactionScope
(old feature)
Is recommended by Microsoft in EF6
Yes
No
Only database related operation in transaction
Yes
No
Mixing DB operation and C# code in the transaction
No
Yes
Wrap Database.ExecuteSqlCommand in transaction if no transaction is specified
Yes
No
Can specify to a new DataContext an existing transaction that will be used
Yes
No
Can be database connection managed manually and specified to objects
Yes (to DataContext)
Partially Yes
Can the isolation level to be controlled
Yes
Yes
Can execute pure SQL queries in a custom transaction
Yes
Yes
Async calls supported in a transaction
Yes
Yes (from .NET 4.5.1, with some small limitation)
Where the transaction is managed and controlled
By developer from code
In background, by the .NET Core
Full control of the transaction
Yes
Partially
Existing transaction can be used
Yes
No

There is limitation related to retry policy. When we are doing multiple SaveChanges to our contexts, the retry policy would not know what data was saved or not. See below example:
using (var db = new FooContext()) 
{ 
    using (var transaction = db.Database.BeginTransaction()) 
    { 
        db.Foos.Add(new Foo()); 
        db.SaveChanges(); 
 
        db.Foos.Add(new Foo()); 
        db.SaveChanges(); 
 
        transaction.Commit(); 
    } 
}
In this case we have a workaround by suspending the retry execution strategy for that peace of code or specify a manual call execution strategy. I highly recommend to review this situations and try to create a store procedure that execute all the necessary changes in one transaction. It is safer and can be controlled easier.
The new way of using transactions is the one that is recommended by EF Team. This is the way how we should use transactions.

Comments

  1. Thanks for your article, it's really clear and helpful.

    ReplyDelete
  2. How can I, if I need to log the error like the ERROR_MESSAGE and ERROR_LINE in SQL SERVER in the catch method where the rollback is being performed?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great insightful article. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  4. why not use
    try
    {
    transaction.Commit();
    }catch(Exceptions)
    {
    transaction.Rollback();
    }

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...