Skip to main content

Using Extensions Methods for DI setup

This days I saw a pretty nice idea of implementing the setup part of a DI container – when you make the setup from code and not from configuration file.
Usually when you are working with DI on a big project, you a piece of code for each component (assembly) that register into the container the instances for that component - ContainerInstaller. When you start the application or load a specific container you need to call that specific class end register all the items for that class.
public class FooInstaller
    public void Install(IContainer container)
This can be made automatically, if you define an interface like IInstaller. Using reflection or other mechanism you can automatically find this installers and run them.
Another solution that I think that is pretty interesting is to define an extension method for each component (assembly) – an extension method of builder. Each component will define internally his own extension method that do the same think as the installer.
public static class FooContainerExtension
    public static void AdFoo(this IContainer container)
In the main entry point of the application, you will need to call the extension method for each component.
This is a nice feature for develops, that don’t need anymore to look over documentation to see which installer they need to call and so on.
Of course this is not a perfect solution and will not work for big project where you need automatically to make this setup. Also, because you define an extension method directly to a specific builder (or container) you will have a direct dependency to the DI container (but how often you change it?).
In conclusion I would say that this is an interesting solution, that can be used with success for small project. This could be a great solution when you define a stack that will be used by others. They will be able to see directly what kind of installer they have available. AND, in the end the extension method can forward the call to an installer class.


Popular posts from this blog

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

GET call of REST API that contains '/'-slash character in the value of a parameter

Let’s assume that we have the following scenario: I have a public HTTP endpoint and I need to post some content using GET command. One of the parameters contains special characters like “\” and “/”. If the endpoint is an ApiController than you may have problems if you encode the parameter using the http encoder.
using (var httpClient = new HttpClient()) { httpClient.BaseAddress = baseUrl; Task<HttpResponseMessage> response = httpClient.GetAsync(string.Format("api/foo/{0}", "qwert/qwerqwer"))); response.Wait(); response.Result.EnsureSuccessStatusCode(); } One possible solution would be to encode the query parameter using UrlTokenEncode method of HttpServerUtility class and GetBytes method ofUTF8. In this way you would get the array of bytes of the parameter and encode them as a url token.
The following code show to you how you could write the encode and decode methods.

Entity Framework (EF) TransactionScope vs Database.BeginTransaction

In today blog post we will talk a little about a new feature that is available on EF6+ related to Transactions.
Until now, when we had to use transaction we used ‘TransactionScope’. It works great and I would say that is something that is now in our blood.
using (var scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required)) { using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("...")) { conn.Open(); SqlCommand sqlCommand = new SqlCommand(); sqlCommand.Connection = conn; sqlCommand.CommandText = ... sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); ... } scope.Complete(); } Starting with EF6.0 we have a new way to work with transactions. The new approach is based on Database.BeginTransaction(), Database.Rollback(), Database.Commit(). Yes, no more TransactionScope.
In the followi…