Skip to main content

Http Request in .NET Compact Edition ended with "Unable to read data from the transport connection … Unknown error (0x0)"

We are leaving in a world that begin to be dominates by smart devices – device2device communication is not something new. Today I would like tack about a problems that we had when we integrated 2 smart devices.
One of the devices expose an HTTP endpoint that can be used to communicate with him. Based on a REST API you can send to him different requests. From our desktops all the communication worked perfectly with this device.
When we imported the client code to a Smart Device Project (special project used to write components for Windows Compact Edition and .NET Compact Framework 3.5) we had a big surprise. Each HTTP request to the first device ended with the following error code:
“Unable to read data from the transport connection … Unknown error (0x0)”
…
at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.finishGetResponse()
at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.GetResponse()…
> The code that generated the error code was:
        public void SetColor(Color color)
        {
            if (color != Color.Red
                && color != Color.Green)
            {
                throw new ArgumentException("Color is not supported", "color");
            }
            try
            {
                byte[] messageContent = UTF8Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(string.Format(MessageBody,
                    color == Color.Red ? RedCode : GreenCode));
                WebRequest request = WebRequest.Create(new Uri(
                                        string.Format("http://{0}/api/{1}/lights/{2}/state",
                                        ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["hueIP"],
                                        ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["hueUser"],
                                        ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["hueNumber"])));
                request.Method = "Put";
                request.Timeout = 10000;
                request.ContentType = "application/json";
                request.ContentLength = messageContent.Length;
                using (Stream stream = request.GetRequestStream())
                {
                    stream.Write(messageContent, 0, messageContent.Length);
                }
            }
            catch (Exception ex)
            {
                Trace.TraceError(ex.Message);
            }
        }
Because we use HttpWebRequest we expected to have a same a similar behavior with “normal” .NET, but it seems that this is not true. When you are working in “normal” .NET a part of the requests method string is automatically converted to UpperCase. In the moment when a request is made, the request method “Put” is converted to “PUT”. But, in a Smart Device project this is not happening – because of code optimization. So you end up with an HTTP request that has the method set to “Put”.
In general, the system will not have any kind of problems with this, because will know how to handle a request method written CamelCase.  In our case the second smart device it seems that cheeks the request method only with PUT written UpperCase.
In conclusion, when you work with a specific protocol, I recommend to always use the exact specification of the protocol and don’t assume that different stacked will make your job for you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

 Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage.   But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provided a too