Skip to main content

Compare two person name (Are the names similar?)


Working on a personal project I need a mechanism to compare two names and find out if they are similar. The first think that I done was to try to define a regular expression that could help me.
I end up studying different algorithms that can measure the distance between two sequences.  In this post I will talk about what algorithms I found and what I finally used.
First algorithm that I found was the based on Hammed distance. This algorithm measure the minimum number of substitutions that need to be done to change a string to another string. This is a great algorithm that works very well when we have string with the same length.
Another interesting algorithm was based on Euclidean distance and is used to measure the distance between two points. It is based on Pythagorean formula. It is a pretty complicated algorithm and in my case was too complicated. I need a simple solution, that doesn't consume a lot of resources. I don’t need exact match each time.
The 3th algorithm that I discover was Jaccard similarity coefficient. Using this solution you can obtain the similarity and diversity value of two sets – in our case two strings.
In the end I found what I need. The Levenshtein distance compare two sequences and measure the difference between them. It will give us how many changes we need to make to the first sequence to obtain the second one.
It is pretty similar to Hammed algorithm, but in my case this solution is good and resolves my problem. The algorithm returns a positive number. In my case when the returned value is 2 or lower I consider that the two names are similar.
Of course there are also a lot of solutions, different components that resolve this problem. In my case this was the perfect solution. The implementation in C# can be found at the end of the post.
You will observe that the algorithm is recursive. We can rewrite it in different ways of course.
Recursive version:
int LevenshteinDistance(string s, string t)
        {
            int n = s.Length;
            int m = t.Length;

            if (n == 0)
            {
                return m;
            }
            if (m == 0)
            {
                return n;
            }

            int cost = s[n - 1] == t[m - 1] 
                        ? 0 
                        : 1;
            
            return
                Math.Min(
                    Math.Min(LevenshteinDistance(s.Substring(0, n - 1), t) + 1,
                                LevenshteinDistance(s, t.Substring(0, m - 1)) + 1),
                    LevenshteinDistance(s.Substring(0, n - 1), t.Substring(0, m - 1)) + cost);
        }
Non recursive version:
int LevenshteinDistance(string s, string t)
        {
            int n = s.Length;
            int m = t.Length;
            int[,] d = new int[n + 1, m + 1];

            if (n == 0)
            {
                return m;
            }

            if (m == 0)
            {
                return n;
            }

            for (int i = 0; i <= n; d[i, 0] = i++){ }
            for (int j = 0; j <= m; d[0, j] = j++){ }

            for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++)
            {
                for (int j = 1; j <= m; j++)
                {
                    int cost = (t[j - 1] == s[i - 1]) 
                                    ? 0 
                                    : 1;
                    d[i, j] = Math.Min(
                                    Math.Min(
                                        d[i - 1, j] + 1, 
                                        d[i, j - 1] + 1),
                                    d[i - 1, j - 1] + cost);
                }
            }
            return d[n, m];
        }

Comments

  1. FYI: Levenshtein distance can be implemented with 2*min(n,m) storage space rather than n*m (that is, you just need the previous and current row of the matrix, and LD(a,b) == LD(b,a) so you can choose the shorter word as the row length).

    Also, for English-only names / words you can use SoundEx: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soundex

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is also the double-megaphone search algorithm.
      The code is not optimized, is only a sample code.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(...

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills) The idea that moving to the cloud reduces the costs is a common misconception. The cloud infrastructure provides flexibility, scalability, and better CAPEX, but it does not guarantee lower costs without proper optimisation and management of the cloud services and infrastructure. Idle and unused resources, overprovisioning, oversize databases, and unnecessary data transfer can increase running costs. The regional pricing mode, multi-cloud complexity, and cost variety add extra complexity to the cost function. Cloud adoption without a cost governance strategy can result in unexpected expenses. Improper usage, combined with a pay-as-you-go model, can result in a nightmare for business stakeholders who cannot track and manage the monthly costs. Cloud-native services such as AI services, managed databases, and analytics platforms are powerful, provide out-of-the-shelve capabilities, and increase business agility and innovation. H...