Skip to main content

How we can remove millions of entities from a Windows Azure Table (part 2)

In one of my latest post I tacked about how we can remove a lot of entities from Windows Azure – deleting the table.
This solution works but we will have to face up with an odd problem. When we are deleting a table, we only mark it for deletion, our client will not be able to access the table and in background Windows Azure will start deleting the table. If we have a table with millions of entities will face up with a big problem. Until Windows Azure will finish deletion of the table will not be able to create a new table with the same time.
This can be a blocker. We don’t want to wait 4 hours, until our table is deleted to be able to recreate another one.
And here is a big BUT. We can be smart and use ListTables. Basically we can create another table that have the name something like [MyTableName]+[Guid] and using ListTable method to retrieve the name of our table only using [MyTableName].
Using this solution, we can add mark our old table for delegation and create a new table with a similar name where we can store our entities. In this way we will be able to remove items from a table in only a few seconds.  Even if this “virtual” clean it works great and can speed up our applications.
The following code can be used to delete a table:
CloudTableClient tableStorage = new CloudTableClient([tableUri],[credential]);
string tableName = [MyTableName];
tableName = tableStorage.ListTables(tableName).FirstOrDefault();
if (tableName != null)
{
  tableStorage.DeleteTableIfExist(tableName);
}
The following code can be used to retrieve the name of our table and recreate a new table of don’t exist:
string tableName = tableStorage.ListTables([MyTableName]).FirstOrDefault();
if (tableName == null)
{
  tableName = [MyTableName] + Guid.NewGuid();
  tableStorage.CreateTableIfNotExist(tableName);
}

The only downside of this solution is that there are some seconds when we will not have a table where clients can access it. If we can leave with this solution and we can manage this problem on the client side than we can use it without any kind of problem.

Comments

  1. The question is: why/when would you need to do something like this is a real application? :)
    (sure, for testing/debugging scenarios it might be useful, but other than that..)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are times when you need to clean a table very fast. For example a table that store the assignment between updates and system where this update is available.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...