Skip to main content

Cum sa definesti un provider custom pentru cache

.NET 4.0 ne-a adus si posibilitatea de a controla output caching. Pana in momentul acesta puteam sa controlam obiectele la care sa se faca cache. Daca de exemplu avem o actiune la care doream sa facem cache, puteam sa folosim atributul OutputCacheAttribute, prin care puteam defini durata la care sa se faca cache si prin ce parametri acest cache sa difere.
[OutputCache(Duration=20, VaryByParam="none")]
public ActionResult GetItems()
{
// Executa ceva.
}
In momentul in care se face un call spre actiunea GetItems, se verifica daca aceasta exista in cache si daca cache-ul este valid( nu a expirat iar parametri trasmisi prin VaryByParam sunt identici). Daca conditiile sunt indeplinite atunci rezultatul se incarca automat din cache si se trimite mai departe, altfel se executa actiunea GetItems, iar rezultatul se salveaza in cache.
In cazul in care dorim sa definim un provider propiu pentru output cache este nevoie sa scriem o clasa ce sa mosteneasca din OutputCacheProvider.
    public abstract class OutputCacheProvider : ProviderBase
{
public abstract object Get(string key);
public abstract object Add(string key, object entry, DateTime utcExpiry);
public abstract void Set(string key, object entry, DateTime utcExpiry);
public abstract void Remove(string key);
}
Prin intermediul metodelor care ne sunt puse la dispozitie, putem sa controlam provider-ul in totalitate.
In web.config este este nevoie sa specificam ce fel de output cache sa se foloseasca:
<caching>
<outputCache defaultProvider="NameOutPutCache">
<providers>
<add name="NameOutPutCache"
type="FullLocationOfOutputCacheImplementation" />
</providers>
</outputCache>
</caching>

Pentru a vedea un exemplu de implementare puteti sa va uitati aici: http://galratner.com/blogs/net/archive/2010/06/06/write-your-own-outputcacheprovider.aspx
Mai jos puteti sa gasiti un exemplu de outputcach provider pentru MongoDb:
 public class MongoDbOutputCacheProvider : OutputCacheProvider, IDisposable
{
readonly Mongo _mongo;
readonly IMongoCollection<CacheItem> _cacheItems;

public MongoDbOutputCacheProvider()
{
// Initializare coneciune la MongoDb
_mongo = new Mongo();
_mongo.Connect();

var store = _mongo.GetDatabase("OutputCacheProviderDB");
_cacheItems = store.GetCollection<CacheItem>();
}

public override object Get(string key)
{
// Se cauta elementul cu cheia dorita.
var cacheItem = _cacheItems.FindOne(new { _id = key });

//Se deserializeaza elementul gasit.
if (cacheItem != null) {
if (cacheItem.Expiration.ToUniversalTime() <= DateTime.UtcNow) {
_cacheItems.Remove(cacheItem);
} else {
return Deserialize(cacheItem.Item);
}
}

return null;
}

public override object Add(string key, object entry, DateTime utcExpiry)
{

if (utcExpiry == DateTime.MaxValue)
{
utcExpiry = DateTime.UtcNow.AddMinutes(5);
}

// Se adauga elementul in baza de date.
_cacheItems.Insert(new CacheItem
{
Id = key,
Item = Serialize(entry),
Expiration = utcExpiry
});

return entry;
}

public override void Set(string key, object entry, DateTime utcExpiry)
{
var item = _cacheItems.FindOne(new { _id = key });

if (item != null)
{
// In cazul in care elementul deja exista se face update la informatii.
item.Item = Serialize(entry);
item.Expiration = utcExpiry;
_cacheItems.Save(item);
}
else
{
// Se insereaza un element nou.
_cacheItems.Insert(new CacheItem
{
Id = key,
Item = Serialize(entry),
Expiration = utcExpiry
});
}
}

public override void Remove(string key)
{
// Se elimina din MongoDb.
_cacheItems.Remove(new { _id = key });
}

private static byte[] Serialize(object entry)
{
var formatter = new BinaryFormatter();
var stream = new MemoryStream();
formatter.Serialize(stream, entry);

return stream.ToArray();
}

private static object Deserialize(byte[] serializedEntry)
{
var formatter = new BinaryFormatter();
var stream = new MemoryStream(serializedEntry);

return formatter.Deserialize(stream);
}

public void Dispose()
{
_mongo.Disconnect();
_mongo.Dispose();
}
}

Implementarea completa se poate gasi aici:
http://archive.msdn.microsoft.com/mag201103OutputCache/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=5514

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Database Modernization Matters for AI

  When companies transition to the cloud, they typically begin with applications and virtual machines, which is often the easier part of the process. The actual complexity arises later when databases are moved. To save time and effort, cloud adoption is more of a cloud migration in an IaaS manner, fulfilling current, but not future needs. Even organisations that are already in the cloud find that their databases, although “migrated,” are not genuinely modernised. This disparity becomes particularly evident when they begin to explore AI technologies. Understanding Modernisation Beyond Migration Database modernisation is distinct from merely relocating an outdated database to Azure. It's about making your data layer ready for future needs, like automation, real-time analytics, and AI capabilities. AI needs high throughput, which can be achieved using native DB cloud capabilities. When your database runs in a traditional setup (even hosted in the cloud), in that case, you will enc...

Cloud Myths: Migrating to the cloud is quick and easy (Pill 2 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

The idea that migration to the cloud is simple, straightforward and rapid is a wrong assumption. It’s a common misconception of business stakeholders that generates delays, budget overruns and technical dept. A migration requires laborious planning, technical expertise and a rigorous process.  Migrations, especially cloud migrations, are not one-size-fits-all journeys. One of the most critical steps is under evaluation, under budget and under consideration. The evaluation phase, where existing infrastructure, applications, database, network and the end-to-end estate are evaluated and mapped to a cloud strategy, is crucial to ensure the success of cloud migration. Additional factors such as security, compliance, and system dependencies increase the complexity of cloud migration.  A misconception regarding lift-and-shits is that they are fast and cheap. Moving applications to the cloud without changes does not provide the capability to optimise costs and performance, leading to ...

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills) The idea that moving to the cloud reduces the costs is a common misconception. The cloud infrastructure provides flexibility, scalability, and better CAPEX, but it does not guarantee lower costs without proper optimisation and management of the cloud services and infrastructure. Idle and unused resources, overprovisioning, oversize databases, and unnecessary data transfer can increase running costs. The regional pricing mode, multi-cloud complexity, and cost variety add extra complexity to the cost function. Cloud adoption without a cost governance strategy can result in unexpected expenses. Improper usage, combined with a pay-as-you-go model, can result in a nightmare for business stakeholders who cannot track and manage the monthly costs. Cloud-native services such as AI services, managed databases, and analytics platforms are powerful, provide out-of-the-shelve capabilities, and increase business agility and innovation. H...